When thinking about sexting, some argue that is it
problematic, while others may argue that it’s progressive. I have been split on the issue since we spoke
about it in class, which also sparked me to look up sexting and its views. While I was in the midst of Googling things
about sexting, I came across this article by Cosmopolitan called “4 Tricks For Your Steamiest Sexts”. Although this article can be see as
controversial, with each one, I have tried to see a progressive/positive point,
and also a problematic/negative point.
1.
Paint a Snapchat with your Words:
In this “tip”, it suggests that a
person shouldn’t necessarily jump the gun and send a “nudie pic” right off the
bat, but rather, “paint a picture” to the receiving end; “get their mind and
heart racing” by suggesting something in a text or snapchat.
Progressive point: It’s still sexy
and it is confident without feeling pressured to send a fully nude photo. As
Lippman & Campbell (2014) said, over half of all people that were in this
study, sexted with a romantic or sexual context. Because of this, it is a progressive idea to “sext”
to someone who you plan to be romantic with/have already been romantic
with. More power to you!
Problematic: The more of these
types of texts or photos a person sends, the more they may feel pressured to
send more and more, being a little racier each time. People should have to feel pressured, they
should do it on their own time.
2.
Cut the Cutesy Emoji
In this “tip”, Cosmo says that by adding cutesy wink
faces or emojis, it adds many different mixed signals, cut all of the cuteness
out, and there won’t be any confusion about “am I texting my little cousin” or “does
she think this is a joke?”
Progressive: Showing your sexy
side. If a person really is confident
enough to send a sext and they cut the cuteness out, they will feel better
about themselves, as well as their partner.
Problematic: If someone isn’t comfortable
enough sexting, or in their own skin, then using emojis could lighten the mood
and help them. This tip might push
people to feel more uncomfortable than needed.
3.
Let Your Freak Fantasy Fly
Cosmopolitan suggests that it is better to “picture who you’re
sexting in their underwear” and be aggressive; say whatever you feel because it’ll
turn into something great.
Progressive: It’ll help partners
to be comfortable with one another and have jokes with each other, lightening
the mood and sharing personal information with one another without feeling
self-conscious about it.
Problematic: Telling someone to be
more aggressive could again, push them in the wrong direction, telling them to
do something they normally wouldn’t do otherwise. This may also push someone to say something
to someone they don’t necessarily fully trust yet.
4.
Figure Out Your Sext Goals
This “tip” tells the readers to
make sure both parties know what the end result of sexting is. There should be a clear idea of where the
sexting is leading to.
Progressive: There are no blurred
lines. Are you meeting in person
sometime soon? Cool. Are you strictly sexting buddies? Also cool.
By stating what is expected, no one is mislead.
Problematic: If two people find out that their goals aren’t
in line, this could lead to rejection and hurt feelings.
All in all, I believe there will always be mixed feelings
about sexting. However, what I think is
important is that people need to see that with every tip and every sext, there
are pros, cons, progressive points, and problematic points. Just make sure you know what you’re getting
yourself into with every sext you send!
Grant, D. (2014). "4 Tricks For Your Steamiest Sexts". Cosmopolitan Magazine. Retrieved from: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/advice/a6941/sext-whisperer/
Lippman, J. & Campbell, S. (2014). "Damned if you do, damned if you don't". Journal of Children and Media. 8: 4. 371-386.
Grant, D. (2014). "4 Tricks For Your Steamiest Sexts". Cosmopolitan Magazine. Retrieved from: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/advice/a6941/sext-whisperer/
Lippman, J. & Campbell, S. (2014). "Damned if you do, damned if you don't". Journal of Children and Media. 8: 4. 371-386.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.